Ban nuclear weapons starting with the US!
Remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki
2/27/21
On
August 6, we will once again recognize one of the most horrendous
events ever to take place in human history. On August 6, 1945,
the United States dropped an atomic bomb on the largely residential
city of Hiroshima. Three days later they dropped a second nuclear
bomb on the city of Nagasaki. As many as 250,000 people, men, women and
children were annihilated and many more died subsequently from the
wounds, radiation poisoning and radiation-induced cancers. The
United States is the only country to ever drop a nuclear bomb on
people.
The
stated reason for this barbaric act was to hasten the end of World War
II. But many historians believe that Japan was ready to surrender
before the dropping of the bomb especially once the Soviet Union
entered the war against Japan and moved its forces into
Manchuria. Germany had already surrendered, and Japan stood
alone. At the time, some argued that the bomb should be dropped
in Tokyo Bay in the water where it would have done far less damage and
Japan’s leaders could see its destructive potential, but the decision
was made to drop it on Hiroshima and then Nagasaki. Once was not
enough, they had to do it twice.
Many
people now believe that the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not
to end WWII, which was in its final days but to start the Cold War and
show the Soviet Union and the world what the US could do if any country
dared to oppose it.
One
also wonders if dropping the bomb on non-white people played a
role. Were Japanese lives valued less by the white supremacist US
government, which maintained a segregated military during World War
II? After all, people of Japanese descent, including US citizens
were put in internment (concentration) camps in the US while people of
German descent were not.
There was also serious consideration by the US of using nuclear weapons in the Korean war. The US actually sent the B29 bombers used to drop the bombs on Japan to a military installation in Okinawa along with the nuclear bombs and their fissile
cores needed to make them work. This was in preparation for their
possible use in the war. President Truman told a press conference
in November 1950 that he would take whatever steps were necessary to
win in Korea, including the use of nuclear weapons. General
Douglas MacArthur, who was the “supreme commander” of the US led forces
in Korea disagreed with Truman on the use of nuclear weapons in the
war. So, Truman fired MacArthur and replaced him with General
Matthew Ridgway, who was given “qualified authority” to use the bombs
if he felt they were necessary.
The
problem the US administration faced with in the use of the atomic bomb
in Korea were two-fold. The first was that the US public and
certainly the people of the world were horrified after seeing the
effects of the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Much of this
horror was accredited to the book Hiroshima by John Hershey which was
published in its entirety in the New Yorker magazine in 1949. The
book described the destruction and told the story of 6 survivors of the
bombing. It led to a groundswell of opposition to nuclear
weapons. The second problem for the US administration was that in
1949 the Soviet Union conducted their first tests of an atomic bomb,
and the assessment was that they soon would have a workable
weapon. Although nuclear weapons were not used in Korea, the
military did several test-runs with their B29 bombers carrying
conventional bombs.
Unlike
WWII, the United States has consistently refused to end the Korean war.
To the US government, it is still going on and they still intend to
win. The US maintains a large troop presence in Korea at the
border with the North and has conducted annual “war games,” which many
consider practice invasions of the Democratic People Republic of Korea
(DPRK), AKA, North Korea. These “war games,” typically include
scenarios in which the US uses nuclear weapons against the DPRK.
In recent years the US has provocatively sent nuclear capable bombers
within 75 miles of the border with the DPRK. Yet in the
upside-down logic of US Imperialism and its corporate media it is not
the war games, the US troops on the border, or the nuclear capable
flights that are provocative but the clearly defensive nuclear program
of the DPRK.
The
bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki opened the nuclear arms race that has
led to today’s reality where it is possible to kill off the entire
population of the world several times over. This is supposed to
make us safer.
But
the nuclear arms race was always one-sided, with the US making the new
and more advanced systems, and then the Soviet Union and later China
taking steps to do the same to gain parity. After the development
of the atomic bomb, the US made the more powerful hydrogen bomb, then
the Soviets did the same. The US then made missile delivery
system and multiple warhead missiles, nuclear submarines, etc. and then
others scrambled to gain parity. And now the US has announced it
will develop a space force, so other countries feel the need to find a
way to counter or do the same. Without the investment of money
and effort that was put into these weapons of mass destruction, the
world may have been able to address global warming, hunger, poverty,
etc. That would have made us safer.
In
recent years the U.S. has unilaterally withdrawn from the
Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, has initiated a $1.5
Trillion program to modernize the U.S. nuclear arsenal and started the
creation of the new military space force.
For
these reasons, the United National Antiwar Coalition sees the main
danger of nuclear war coming from the United States and believes that
we in the U.S. have a special obligation to the world to oppose that
danger.
Ban nuclear weapons starting with the US!
Remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Click here to read this statement in your browser
|